America's Test Kitchen LogoCook's Country LogoCook's Illustrated Logo

Reviews You Can Trust.
See Why.

The Best Countertop Ice Makers

All the ice you could ever want, right on your counter. Too good to be true?

Editor&aposs Note:Update, August 2024

We still think that the IGLOO Premium Self-Cleaning Countertop Ice Maker is the best ice maker for most people.

What You Need to Know

If you’re not getting enough ice from your freezer ice maker or trays, a countertop ice maker could be a good option. We liked two models that produce hollow, cylindrical, “bullet”-style ice. The IGLOO Premium Self-Cleaning Countertop Ice Maker is our favorite compact model. It’s lightweight and easy to carry thanks to its cooler-style handle, and it was impressively speedy for a smaller model. For those with larger spaces who are interested in quickly making a lot of ice, we suggest the Newair Countertop Ice Maker, which can produce nearly 2 pounds of ice per hour. It was bulky and heavy but simple to use. We also named the pricey GE Profile Opal 2.0 Nugget Ice Maker as our favorite nugget ice maker. It was the fastest and easiest to use of the nugget-style machines.

our winning countertop ice makers by igloo, newair and GE

Countertop ice makers are ideal for people whose freezers don’t have built-in ice makers and who aren’t satisfied with the hassle or small capacities of ice trays. They’re also a more portable option for home bars, dorm rooms or studios, and boats or RVs. Many people use countertop models 24/7 to always have ice on hand, while some folks only bring them out for parties or trips and store them when they’re not in use. 

To make ice, you fill the reservoirs through openings on the front or at the top of the machines. Some models also use external tanks mounted on their sides. Similar to commercial ice makers or the devices in home freezers, countertop ice makers use a compressor filled with refrigerant to cool metal ice molds and freeze water into one of several cube shapes. The ice drops into collection bins, ready to be scooped out for the next frosty drink. All the machines have sensors that monitor ice levels and restart the machines if the ice gets low. But ice makers aren’t freezers in and of themselves. They’re not built to keep ice cold indefinitely because they’re not circulating frigid air as a freezer does. As unused ice in the bins begins to melt, the water collects under the bins and is recirculated to make more ice. 

Using most of the machines for the first time is as simple as setting them up, running a cleaning cycle, then filling them with water and turning them on. Ice collects in the bin, and any melt water recirculates to become ice once more.

The machines we tested make three different types of ice. The majority make “bullet” ice, which is cylindrical and hollow with one domed end, just like its namesake. Other models make classic square cubes that you can find at most bars and restaurants. A few machines make “nugget” or “pellet” ice, the wonderfully crunchy, tiny ice cylinders that are popular at soda fountains and some fast food joints. (For more information, see FAQ “How are different ice shapes made?”) We named winners for most of the machine styles we tested, and we found some common factors that you should look for when shopping.

Bullet ice was relatively soft and snowy when chewed and quicker to melt. Square ice was thick, solid, and substantial—perfect for cocktails. Nugget ice was nostalgic and pleasant to crunch on and paired wonderfully with seltzers, spritzes, and sodas.

What to Look For

  • Speedy Ice Production: Our favorite models were fast, producing ice quickly after startup and continuing to churn out cubes efficiently over time. The speediest models were capable of making nearly 2 pounds of ice per hour. They also effectively sensed when ice had melted or been removed and kicked into ice-making mode quickly.
  • Simple, Clear Controls and Displays: We liked machines that operated using only a few clearly marked buttons, with displays or indicator lights that plainly showed the status of the ice makers. 
The best displays incorporated only a few clearly marked buttons and indicator lights, helping us to gauge a machines status at a glance.
  • Effective Self-Cleaning Cycles: Gunk or limescale can build up quickly inside the machines, so cleaning them often is important to prevent damage to the ice makers or off flavors in the ice. We liked models with self-cleaning cycles because they did the majority of the work for us. We merely filled their reservoirs with vinegar or bleach solutions, started their self-cleaning cycles, and then repeated the process with clean water. 
  • Convenient Drains: When cleaning an ice maker or putting it away between uses, you need to drain it completely. Our favorite models had drains that came with hoses, which were easy to direct into sinks without moving the ice makers very much. Among hoseless models, we liked those with drain plugs that were located under the units’ front corners, making them easier to maneuver over a sink. Drain plugs with large tabs that were easy to grab and pull were best. 
Draining is important for cleaning and storage, and we preferred machines with drain hoses that reached into the sink without too much shifting or repositioning. In lieu of hoses, we liked drain plugs positioned under the machines front corners that were easy to grasp onto and remove.
  • Discrete Cubes: We preferred models that made separate ice cubes, instead of forming large frozen-together blocks of ice that we had to break up ourselves.

Nice to Have 

  • Handles: A couple models had handles: either cooler-style handles that swung up and over from the back or indentations in their sides meant for grasping. Carrying these models was significantly easier than maneuvering models without any handholds.
  • Side Tanks: With some models, you have the option to purchase a water tank that connects to the side of the machine to supplement the water supplied by their standard, built-in reservoirs. The side tanks held up to 3 quarts of water, which made enough ice to last for two days of routine use at home.
One machine connected to Wi-Fi and could be controlled by a digital assistant (such as Amazon Alexa or Google Home). We found this feature occasionally helpful for scheduling ice production or remotely controlling the light, but don’t consider it a gamechanger.

What to Avoid

  • Slow Ice Production: Some models took as long as 30 minutes to produce their first ice cubes, and some yielded less than 12 ounces of ice an hour—not enough for most people’s needs. 
  • Overly Complicated or Overly Simple Controls: Displays with too many symbols or numbers made it hard to know what modes the machines were in with a single glance. Other machines had controls and indicator lights that were too simple, often relying on a single button to toggle between functions without confirmation that we had made any changes. 
  • Machines without Automatic Cleaning: Machines without automatic cleaning cycles provided no way to access and descale all the internal components. Some of these models’ manuals provided instructions on disassembling certain parts for cleaning, but this was a big headache. 
  • Poorly Designed Drains: The drain plugs on some ice makers were inconveniently located on the side or at the back of the machines. It was a hassle to reposition or lug around these models so that we could drain them over the sink. 

Some machines had reservoirs in their tops with small openings (left); we often spilled when trying to fill them. We liked machines with reservoirs with large openings that we filled from the front (right).

  • Poorly Designed Reservoirs: Some models’ reservoirs were filled through small holes in the machines’ tops. We always spilled water when trying to fill them.
  • Frozen-Together Cubes: Some machines deposited ice in solid sheets that we had to break apart ourselves. This was often difficult, especially as more and more sheets accumulated into a stacked, solid mass.
Machines that made square cubes actually deposited the ice as frozen-together sheets, forcing us to break them up with their flimsy plastic scoops before the next sheet could drop. We preferred discrete cubes.

The Tests

  • Unpack, set up, and clean the machines according to manufacturer instructions
  • Turn on the ice makers, noting elapsed time and ice quality of first production cycle (using smallest ice setting when applicable)
  • Continue to run the machines, noting quality and amount of ice produced in 1 hour (first using smallest ice setting, then using largest ice setting when applicable)
  • Continuously run the ice makers over several days, noting ice storage ability and effectiveness of recirculation functions
  • Test machines using external tanks or faucet hookups when applicable
  • Have additional testers operate the ice makers in their home kitchens


How We Rated

  • Performance: We measured how much ice the machines made and how quickly they made it. We also examined the machines’ ice quality.
  • Ease of Use: We evaluated how difficult it was to remove ice from the machines, fill them with water, and drain them. We also noted how simple the machines’ controls were to operate, and whether their displays were easy to interpret.
  • Setup and Cleaning: We assessed how easy the ice makers were to unbox, set up, and clean according to manufacturer instructions. We also noted whether they were especially noisy or bulky.

FAQs

All of the ice makers we tested start the ice-making process in a somewhat similar way: They use refrigerant to chill ice molds to extremely cold temperatures. It varies after that. For bullet ice, water flows into bullet-shaped ice molds. Freezing-cold metal rods are inserted into the water-filled molds. The water freezes within minutes, and the rods are extracted, leaving behind a hollow cylindrical center in each piece of ice. In square ice makers, water flows continuously over a supercooled metal grid, and ice slowly accumulates until the grid is frozen solid. Then there’s nugget ice, which is made using a single large metal cylinder. Water flows into the base of the freezing cylinder and starts to freeze against the metal. Meanwhile, an auger turns inside the cylinder and shaves the accumulating ice into flakes. The auger pushes the ice flakes up the cylinder, which compresses the ice into a compact yet flaky mass. The auger then forces the laminated ice mass through small holes, creating rods of crunchy ice that are pushed into a flat metal disk that breaks them into nuggets.

Most models were capable of making ice in multiple sizes. For bullet-style ice, cubes of different sizes had the same width but varied in length, up to about ½ inch. Square cubes retained the same external dimensions, but the cubes from smaller size settings were hollow, and larger settings were solid. Larger cubes took longer to make but didn’t melt as quickly. We thought the size settings were a nice plus but not an essential feature.

Cleaning your ice maker is extremely important to prevent mold growth or limescale buildup, especially in areas with hard water. A dirty ice maker can also impart off flavors to ice. The best answer to this question is “as often as you can,” but we think the most realistic answer is about once a month. Machines with self-cleaning cycles make the process nearly hands-off. Simply fill the reservoir with the recommended cleaning solution and then start the self-cleaning cycle, which circulates the liquid and descales the machines’ internal components. Then drain the machine and repeat the cycle with clean water before switching it back to ice-making mode. Be sure to read your device’s manual to determine what cleaners to use: Bleach, vinegar, or dedicated descaling solution are common suggestions.

Every model we tested made some amount of noise as it circulated water and produced ice, but some were quieter than others. The ambient noise of most models was no more than that of a standard dishwasher, but you will hear ice falling into the bins. Smaller pieces of nugget ice made a lot less sound when they were deposited, as opposed to the loud clanks of bullet or square ice cubes.

While nugget ice can be useful for serving many mixed drinks, you might want to check out our review of dedicated ice molds for cocktails.

You're probably better off sticking with a standard freezer-based ice tray. Read our review of the best ice trays on the market.

03:30

America's Test KitchenThe Best Countertop Ice MakersWatch Now

Everything We Tested

Good 3 Stars out of 3.
Fair 2 Stars out of 3.
Poor 1 Star out of 3.

Highly Recommended

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

Best for Most PeopleIGLOO Premium Self-Cleaning Countertop Ice Maker

This model was efficient for its small size, capable of making just under 1 pound of ice every hour and depositing its first ice batch within 8 minutes of being turned on. Its convenient handle—similar to that of a cooler—combined with its lightweight build made it more portable than any other machine we tested. It did an acceptable job of keeping ice cold, and it recirculated water well to make sure there was always ice on hand. We also liked the distinct difference in ice size options it offered. We were impressed by its simple, clear controls and indicator lights, which allowed us to check its status at a glance. Best of all, it was the only compact model to have an efficient self-cleaning cycle, making routine descalings extremely easy.

Model Number: IGLICEB26HNBK

Ice Style: Bullet

Weight: 17 lb

Dimensions: 9 x 12 x 12 in

Self-Cleaning: Yes

Number of Ice Size Options: 2

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 15.4 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $153.00

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

This model was efficient for its small size, capable of making just under 1 pound of ice every hour and depositing its first ice batch within 8 minutes of being turned on. Its convenient handle—similar to that of a cooler—combined with its lightweight build made it more portable than any other machine we tested. It did an acceptable job of keeping ice cold, and it recirculated water well to make sure there was always ice on hand. We also liked the distinct difference in ice size options it offered. We were impressed by its simple, clear controls and indicator lights, which allowed us to check its status at a glance. Best of all, it was the only compact model to have an efficient self-cleaning cycle, making routine descalings extremely easy.

Model Number: IGLICEB26HNBK

Ice Style: Bullet

Weight: 17 lb

Dimensions: 9 x 12 x 12 in

Self-Cleaning: Yes

Number of Ice Size Options: 2

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 15.4 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $153.00

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

Best Nugget Ice MakerGE Profile Opal 2.0 Nugget Ice Maker

Using this spendy model was a luxurious experience. It was among the most efficient models we tested, producing just over 1.5 pounds of crisp, clean-tasting nugget ice per hour. Its thoughtfully designed side tank was easy to install, and its straightforward self-cleaning mode functioned well. We also liked this model’s controls, which employed a few touch-sensitive buttons and LED light bars to clearly communicate the machine’s status and switch between cleaning and production (and operate the ice bin’s light). It was heavy, bulky, and expensive, but it would be a beautiful addition to any nugget-ice aficionado’s home bar. It also connects to Wi-Fi to allow scheduling cycles from a mobile app or a virtual assistant, though we didn’t think this added much value.

Model Number: XPIO13BCBT

Ice Style: Nugget

Weight: 38 lb without tank, 41 lb with tank

Dimensions: 10 x 15 x 16.5 in without tank, 13 x 15 x 16.5 in with tank

Self-Cleaning: Yes

Number of Ice Size Options: 1

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 8.8 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $649.00

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

Using this spendy model was a luxurious experience. It was among the most efficient models we tested, producing just over 1.5 pounds of crisp, clean-tasting nugget ice per hour. Its thoughtfully designed side tank was easy to install, and its straightforward self-cleaning mode functioned well. We also liked this model’s controls, which employed a few touch-sensitive buttons and LED light bars to clearly communicate the machine’s status and switch between cleaning and production (and operate the ice bin’s light). It was heavy, bulky, and expensive, but it would be a beautiful addition to any nugget-ice aficionado’s home bar. It also connects to Wi-Fi to allow scheduling cycles from a mobile app or a virtual assistant, though we didn’t think this added much value.

Model Number: XPIO13BCBT

Ice Style: Nugget

Weight: 38 lb without tank, 41 lb with tank

Dimensions: 10 x 15 x 16.5 in without tank, 13 x 15 x 16.5 in with tank

Self-Cleaning: Yes

Number of Ice Size Options: 1

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 8.8 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $649.00

Recommended

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

Best OutputNewair Countertop Ice Maker

This model was the fastest we tested, making nearly 2 pounds of ice per hour once up and running. Though it was big and heavy, it had convenient handles for transport that made it surprisingly portable and easy to set up. We liked using the simple controls to toggle between ice sizes or turn on this model’s effective self-cleaning function. Its recirculation system worked optimally to collect and refreeze runoff. We just wished its drain plug had a better design; it was awkwardly perched on the side of the machine and we had trouble unscrewing the bolt.

Model Number: AI-215SS

Ice Style: Bullet

Weight: 30 lb

Dimensions: 13.5 x 16 x 16 in

Self-Cleaning: Yes

Number of Ice Size Options: 3

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 14.3 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $279.95

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

This model was the fastest we tested, making nearly 2 pounds of ice per hour once up and running. Though it was big and heavy, it had convenient handles for transport that made it surprisingly portable and easy to set up. We liked using the simple controls to toggle between ice sizes or turn on this model’s effective self-cleaning function. Its recirculation system worked optimally to collect and refreeze runoff. We just wished its drain plug had a better design; it was awkwardly perched on the side of the machine and we had trouble unscrewing the bolt.

Model Number: AI-215SS

Ice Style: Bullet

Weight: 30 lb

Dimensions: 13.5 x 16 x 16 in

Self-Cleaning: Yes

Number of Ice Size Options: 3

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 14.3 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $279.95

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

GE Profile Opal Nugget Ice Maker

This attractive model had the ice-making chops to earn its large footprint. It was fairly fast, cranking out nearly 1.5 pounds of ice per hour once it got up and running, and we were impressed by its perfect nugget-style ice. It was heavy and solid, so unboxing and lifting it was difficult, but setup and cleaning were otherwise straightforward. We liked its drain hoses, which funneled water into the sink without us having to move the machine too much, making occasional cleanings easier. It uses a single touch-screen button and indicator light on its front for most functions, which we found difficult to interpret at times. We also spilled ice out of its front-tilt ice bin every so often when scooping.

Model Number: OPAL01GENKT

Ice Style: Nugget

Weight: 40 lb without tank, 43 lb with tank

Dimensions: 10 x 14 x 17 in without tank, 14 x 14 x 17 in with tank

Self-Cleaning: Yes

Number of Ice Size Options: 1

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 7 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $554.60

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

This attractive model had the ice-making chops to earn its large footprint. It was fairly fast, cranking out nearly 1.5 pounds of ice per hour once it got up and running, and we were impressed by its perfect nugget-style ice. It was heavy and solid, so unboxing and lifting it was difficult, but setup and cleaning were otherwise straightforward. We liked its drain hoses, which funneled water into the sink without us having to move the machine too much, making occasional cleanings easier. It uses a single touch-screen button and indicator light on its front for most functions, which we found difficult to interpret at times. We also spilled ice out of its front-tilt ice bin every so often when scooping.

Model Number: OPAL01GENKT

Ice Style: Nugget

Weight: 40 lb without tank, 43 lb with tank

Dimensions: 10 x 14 x 17 in without tank, 14 x 14 x 17 in with tank

Self-Cleaning: Yes

Number of Ice Size Options: 1

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 7 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $554.60

Recommended with reservations

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

Frigidaire Compact Ice Maker

We especially liked this model’s relatively large ice and speedy production cycles, which made about 1 pound of ice per hour. We also liked its small footprint and simple, straightforward controls. We were frustrated by its lack of an automatic cleaning option, since manually cleaning the hard-to-reach components was tedious and didn’t feel thorough enough. We also found its drain plug especially difficult to remove, a small but important quibble.

Model Number: EFIC189

Ice Style: Bullet

Weight: 18 lb

Dimensions: 9 x 13 x 12 in

Self-Cleaning: No

Number of Ice Size Options: 2

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 0.4 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $129.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

We especially liked this model’s relatively large ice and speedy production cycles, which made about 1 pound of ice per hour. We also liked its small footprint and simple, straightforward controls. We were frustrated by its lack of an automatic cleaning option, since manually cleaning the hard-to-reach components was tedious and didn’t feel thorough enough. We also found its drain plug especially difficult to remove, a small but important quibble.

Model Number: EFIC189

Ice Style: Bullet

Weight: 18 lb

Dimensions: 9 x 13 x 12 in

Self-Cleaning: No

Number of Ice Size Options: 2

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 0.4 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $129.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

Silonn Countertop Ice Maker

This simple model was lightweight and portable, and we liked that it had a straightforward control panel and was fairly easy to set up. We also liked that it began making ice fairly quickly, but its total output over time was small, even for a compact machine. Its ice cubes were also consistently smaller and melted quicker than those from the other compact, bullet-style makers we tested. Its self-cleaning cycle was effective, but it took a whopping 30 minutes. The machine also didn't indicate when the cleaning process was complete.

Model Number: ‎‎‎SLIM01G1

Ice Style: Bullet

Weight: 15 lb

Dimensions: 8.5 x 11.5 x 12 in

Self-Cleaning: Yes

Number of Ice Size Options: 2

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 12.1 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $105.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

This simple model was lightweight and portable, and we liked that it had a straightforward control panel and was fairly easy to set up. We also liked that it began making ice fairly quickly, but its total output over time was small, even for a compact machine. Its ice cubes were also consistently smaller and melted quicker than those from the other compact, bullet-style makers we tested. Its self-cleaning cycle was effective, but it took a whopping 30 minutes. The machine also didn't indicate when the cleaning process was complete.

Model Number: ‎‎‎SLIM01G1

Ice Style: Bullet

Weight: 15 lb

Dimensions: 8.5 x 11.5 x 12 in

Self-Cleaning: Yes

Number of Ice Size Options: 2

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 12.1 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $105.99

Not Recommended

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

Euhomy Countertop Ice Maker

This model produced large batches of ice very slowly, and we wished it would produce smaller batches faster. We had a hard time pouring water into its small reservoir opening and found its poorly placed rear drain plug difficult to use. Its complicated display screen showed a mystifying jumble of numbers and symbols, and we were put off by its lack of an automatic cleaning function. As with the other square ice maker we tested, we had to manually break up the ice after every cycle, meaning we couldn’t just leave the machine alone or it would become increasingly difficult to separate the mass of ice into usable cubes.

Model Number: ‎‎‎IM-F

Ice Style: Square

Weight: 23 lb

Dimensions: 11 x 14 x 14 in

Self-Cleaning: No

Number of Ice Size Options: 12

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 3 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $229.90

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

This model produced large batches of ice very slowly, and we wished it would produce smaller batches faster. We had a hard time pouring water into its small reservoir opening and found its poorly placed rear drain plug difficult to use. Its complicated display screen showed a mystifying jumble of numbers and symbols, and we were put off by its lack of an automatic cleaning function. As with the other square ice maker we tested, we had to manually break up the ice after every cycle, meaning we couldn’t just leave the machine alone or it would become increasingly difficult to separate the mass of ice into usable cubes.

Model Number: ‎‎‎IM-F

Ice Style: Square

Weight: 23 lb

Dimensions: 11 x 14 x 14 in

Self-Cleaning: No

Number of Ice Size Options: 12

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 3 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $229.90

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

Luma Comfort Portable Clear Cube Ice Maker

This midsize ice maker produced an acceptable amount of ice per hour, but it was slow to get going and difficult to use for a few reasons. We found its controls to be too simple and thus hard to interpret; there was no confirmation that we had successfully toggled between ice sizes. It deposited ice in its collection bin in solid sheets instead of separate cubes, forcing us to hover over it and break up the ice with a scoop as it worked, lest the bin fill up too quickly with an unbreakable stack of ice sheets. We also spilled every time we poured water into the small opening at the top of the reservoir, and the drain plug was in an inconvenient spot at the back of the machine. It didn’t have a self-clean feature, and proper descaling would require complicated disassembly.

Model Number: IM200SS

Ice Style: Square

Weight: 24 lb

Dimensions: 11 x 14 x 13.5 in

Self-Cleaning: No

Number of Ice Size Options: 2

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 1.7 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $169.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

This midsize ice maker produced an acceptable amount of ice per hour, but it was slow to get going and difficult to use for a few reasons. We found its controls to be too simple and thus hard to interpret; there was no confirmation that we had successfully toggled between ice sizes. It deposited ice in its collection bin in solid sheets instead of separate cubes, forcing us to hover over it and break up the ice with a scoop as it worked, lest the bin fill up too quickly with an unbreakable stack of ice sheets. We also spilled every time we poured water into the small opening at the top of the reservoir, and the drain plug was in an inconvenient spot at the back of the machine. It didn’t have a self-clean feature, and proper descaling would require complicated disassembly.

Model Number: IM200SS

Ice Style: Square

Weight: 24 lb

Dimensions: 11 x 14 x 13.5 in

Self-Cleaning: No

Number of Ice Size Options: 2

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 1.7 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $169.99

Discontinued

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

Gevi Nugget Ice Maker

We were pleased with this model’s large ice bin capacity and consistently shaped nugget ice. Its recirculation system also functioned well, ensuring that we had fresh ice at all hours, and it did a good job at keeping ice cold. It was slightly slower than the other nugget makers but still made more than 1 pound of ice per hour, and we liked its straightforward controls. Its auto-clean function also worked well. But it was among the heavier machines in our lineup, and it was especially cumbersome to unpack and set up due to its unbalanced shape. This product has been recalled.

Model Number: ‎‎GIMN-1102

Ice Style: Nugget

Weight: 34 lb

Dimensions: 9.5 x 16.5 x 16 in

Self-Cleaning: Yes

Number of Ice Size Options: 1

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 2.4 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $479.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Setup and Cleaning

We were pleased with this model’s large ice bin capacity and consistently shaped nugget ice. Its recirculation system also functioned well, ensuring that we had fresh ice at all hours, and it did a good job at keeping ice cold. It was slightly slower than the other nugget makers but still made more than 1 pound of ice per hour, and we liked its straightforward controls. Its auto-clean function also worked well. But it was among the heavier machines in our lineup, and it was especially cumbersome to unpack and set up due to its unbalanced shape. This product has been recalled.

Model Number: ‎‎GIMN-1102

Ice Style: Nugget

Weight: 34 lb

Dimensions: 9.5 x 16.5 x 16 in

Self-Cleaning: Yes

Number of Ice Size Options: 1

Ice Produced in 1 Hour: 1 lb, 2.4 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $479.99

*All products reviewed by America’s Test Kitchen are independently chosen, researched, and reviewed by our editors. We buy products for testing at retail locations and do not accept unsolicited samples for testing. We list suggested sources for recommended products as a convenience to our readers but do not endorse specific retailers. When you choose to purchase our editorial recommendations from the links we provide, we may earn an affiliate commission. Prices are subject to change.

America's Test Kitchen Accolades Badge

Reviews You Can Trust

The mission of America’s Test Kitchen Reviews is to find the best equipment and ingredients for the home cook through rigorous, hands-on testing. We stand behind our winners so much that we even put our seal of approval on them. Have a question or suggestion? Send us an email at atkreviews@americastestkitchen.com. We appreciate your feedback!

The Expert

Author: Chase Brightwell

byChase Brightwell

Associate Editor, ATK Reviews

Chase is an associate editor for ATK Reviews. He's an epidemiologist-turned-equipment tester and biscuit enthusiast. 

Chase Brightwell is an associate editor for ATK Reviews. He left a career in infectious disease research to answer fascinating food questions full-time. He loves combining his culinary passions with analytical methods to evaluate equipment and ingredients—from grill gloves, fire pits, and cleaning supplies to heirloom beans and puff pastry. He lives in Maine with his husband, daughter, and black lab and has never met a biscuit he didn't like.

Reviews You Can Trust.
See Why.

This is a members' feature.

America's Test Kitchen LogoCook's Country LogoCook's Illustrated Logo