America's Test Kitchen LogoCook's Country LogoCook's Illustrated Logo

Reviews You Can Trust.
See Why.

The Best Stockpots

Stockpots may not be front and center in your kitchen, but a good one can tackle a wide variety of meals.

Editor&aposs Note:Update, January 2025

We tested a few new 12-quart stockpots. Our previous winner, the Cook N Home Stainless Steel Stockpot with Lid 12 Quart, now shares its title with the T-fal Specialty Stainless Steel 12 Qt. Stockpot

What You Need to Know

The best stockpots boast stainless-steel construction, are lightweight, and feature comfortable handles with textured grips. Two models rose to the top of our rankings: the Cook N Home Stainless Steel Stockpot with Lid 12 Quart and the T-fal Specialty Stainless Steel 12 Qt. Stockpot. They were also among the least expensive in our lineup. 

We prefer using stockpots for tasks involving large-scale boiling and simmering. If you’re more interested in making soups and stews, check out our review of Dutch ovens!

two stainless-steel stockpots sit on a marble counter. Text surrounds them, calling out various attributes that are useful: light weight, stainless steel.

A stockpot is like an umbrella: You don’t use it often, but it’s invaluable when you need it. Usually hidden in a cabinet, it becomes a star player when making chicken broth in colder months. A large pot like this is also handy for cooking multiple ears of corn on the cob, whole lobsters, or big batches of pasta. You can also use it when making stew or chili for a crowd. 

What’s the Best Size Stockpot?

For this review, we focused on stockpots that hold 12 quarts because we think this is the most useful size—big enough to accommodate our largest jobs yet small enough to easily store. All the stockpots were able to boil water at a reasonable speed, taking from 14½ minutes to 20 minutes to boil 4 quarts of water on medium heat. Our recommendations came down to other factors. 

Assistant Editor Emily Phares takes notes during a visual inspection of stockpots.

Are Expensive Stockpots Worth the Money?

Stockpots are generally made from stainless steel or aluminum, but the type of metal—and its construction—can determine its price. Cheaper stockpots are usually made from a single piece of stainless steel or aluminum, often with a thicker metal disk to reinforce the base. 

You’ll pay more for stainless-steel pots that are considered fully clad—meaning that the cooking surface and walls are made of three or more layers of bonded metal, usually with stainless steel sandwiching a layer (or layers) of aluminum. Fully clad pots are thicker, heavier, and often more durable than pots made from a single piece of metal, and they perform better with tasks involving sautéing or searing, cooking foods exceptionally evenly. 

a man in a blue shirt inserts a ladle into a stockpot full of liquid. another stockpot is on the stove with liquid and an onion. A man in a red shirt looks on.
For making large batches of stock and soup, a stockpot is essential.

But while we often prefer fully clad cookware such as saucepans and skillets, we’ve found that cladding is not essential here. With stockpots, we’re usually boiling or simmering ingredients rather than sautéing them. And because we expect stockpots to hold very large, heavy volumes of liquid and other ingredients, we actually prefer lighter-weight, thinner models—they weigh less, are easier to lift, and can take slightly less time to bring the contents to a boil.

This is one instance where we think it makes sense to save your money and go with a cheaper, thinner pot. However, if you plan to do a lot of sautéing or make large batches of stews and chilis—and don’t mind spending significantly more—a fully clad stockpot can be a good option.

What to Look For

  • Stainless-Steel Construction: We preferred stainless-steel pots as they were durable, nonreactive, and performed well across our testing. They were also able to withstand heat without discoloring.
  • Light Weight: Our winning pots were on the lighter end of the spectrum, weighing a little over 4 pounds without their lids, and were therefore easier to lift and maneuver. Heavier models (weighing more than 5 or 6 pounds) weren’t dealbreakers but required extra effort when draining and straining food.
  • Large Looped Handles: Generous-sized looped handles made our winning stockpots easy and quick to grab, even when we were wearing bulky oven mitts. Smaller handles were harder to grip.
Hands swathed in black oven mitts grab the handles of a stainless-steel stockpot. The words "Large Looped Handles" appear in one corner of the image.
Large looped handles made the best stockpots easy to grab and transport.
  • Well-Fitting Lid: We preferred lids that were easy to position in place and sat neatly inside the pot’s rim. 
A hand is in the act of placing a glass lid on top of a stainless-steel stockpot. The words "well-fitting lid" appear on top.
We preferred lids that sat securely on top of their pots, preventing too much steam from escaping.

Nice to Have

  • Textured Grips: Rubber and silicone grips offered added security and comfort when transporting heavy chicken broth and bones to the sink.

The Tests

  • Make Foolproof Boiled Corn, using tongs to remove the ears
  • Boil 2 pounds of angel hair pasta, frequently stirring the pasta, and strain afterward
  • Sauté 1 cup of diced onion in 2 tablespoons olive oil over medium-low heat until golden brown
  • Make Classic Chicken Broth
  • Wash five times according to manufacturer instructions


How We Rated

  • Ease of Use: We rated stockpots highly if they fit all foods with ease and if they were lightweight and easy to maneuver around the kitchen, cook in, and pour from.
  • Performance: We rated the stockpots on how well they performed a variety of tasks, including boiling water and making chicken broth.
  • Durability: We gave strongest marks to stockpots that didn’t discolor or otherwise degrade during testing and that held up to repeated washings without showing signs of damage.

FAQs

Stockpots are usually induction compatible. Most are made from ferromagnetic metals—that is, metals that magnets will stick to. All the models we tested are induction compatible. We’ve noted this information in the chart below. We also have a guide to our favorite induction-compatible cookware with information on many more items.

03:09

America's Test KitchenStockpotsWatch Now

Everything We Tested

Good 3 Stars out of 3.
Fair 2 Stars out of 3.
Poor 1 Star out of 3.

Highly Recommended

  • Durability
  • Ease of Use
  • Performance

Co-winnerCook N Home Stainless Steel Stockpot with Lid 12 Quart

Our co-winner performed well and excelled in comfort. Its single-ply stainless-steel construction made it light and maneuverable. And we liked its comfortable looped handles, which made it easy to carry and pour from.
Model Number: 02441Construction: Stainless-steel 18/10 pot with aluminum and stainless-steel disk bottom, tempered glass lidWeight Without Lid: 4 lb, 1¼ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $28.42
  • Durability
  • Ease of Use
  • Performance
Our co-winner performed well and excelled in comfort. Its single-ply stainless-steel construction made it light and maneuverable. And we liked its comfortable looped handles, which made it easy to carry and pour from.
Model Number: 02441Construction: Stainless-steel 18/10 pot with aluminum and stainless-steel disk bottom, tempered glass lidWeight Without Lid: 4 lb, 1¼ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $28.42
  • Durability
  • Ease of Use
  • Performance

T-fal Specialty Stainless Steel 12 Qt. Stockpot

Our co-winner was one of the lightest models we tested. It was also one of two models to feature rubber/silicone grip handles. These were very comfortable and made lifting and maneuvering easier. Durability was no issue for this pot, which did not discolor or warp during testing.
Model Number: C8888164Construction: Stainless steel, tempered glass lidWeight Without Lid: 4 lb, 1⅜ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $35.99
  • Durability
  • Ease of Use
  • Performance
Our co-winner was one of the lightest models we tested. It was also one of two models to feature rubber/silicone grip handles. These were very comfortable and made lifting and maneuvering easier. Durability was no issue for this pot, which did not discolor or warp during testing.
Model Number: C8888164Construction: Stainless steel, tempered glass lidWeight Without Lid: 4 lb, 1⅜ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $35.99
  • Durability
  • Ease of Use
  • Performance

Cuisinart Chef's Classic 12-Quart Stockpot with Cover

We liked how lightweight this pot felt, and it was easy to transport from stove to sink. Its lid, which weighed about 14 ounces, was the lightest in the lineup and easy to position in place. The pot featured comfortable looped handles.
Model Number: 766-26Construction: Stainless-steel pot with disk-bottom aluminum base encapsulated in stainless steelWeight Without Lid: 4 lb, 17/8 ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $69.95
  • Durability
  • Ease of Use
  • Performance
We liked how lightweight this pot felt, and it was easy to transport from stove to sink. Its lid, which weighed about 14 ounces, was the lightest in the lineup and easy to position in place. The pot featured comfortable looped handles.
Model Number: 766-26Construction: Stainless-steel pot with disk-bottom aluminum base encapsulated in stainless steelWeight Without Lid: 4 lb, 17/8 ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $69.95

Recommended

  • Durability
  • Ease Of Use
  • Performance

Tramontina Gourmet 12-Qt. Stainless Steel Covered Stock Pot

Even though this pot weighed more than 5 pounds, we found it relatively easy to hold, thanks to its big looped handles. The handles also allowed us to make very controlled pours when we needed to drain hot liquids. This model was easy to clean and performed well throughout testing.
Model Number: 80120/000DSConstruction: 18/10 stainless-steel with tri-ply clad baseWeight Without Lid: 5 lb, 5½ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $70.88
  • Durability
  • Ease Of Use
  • Performance
Even though this pot weighed more than 5 pounds, we found it relatively easy to hold, thanks to its big looped handles. The handles also allowed us to make very controlled pours when we needed to drain hot liquids. This model was easy to clean and performed well throughout testing.
Model Number: 80120/000DSConstruction: 18/10 stainless-steel with tri-ply clad baseWeight Without Lid: 5 lb, 5½ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $70.88
  • Durability
  • Ease Of Use
  • Performance

Made In Stainless Clad 12 Qt. Stock Pot

Although it weighed in at more than 5 pounds, this pot was shorter and wider than most of the models we tested, so it was easier to maneuver compared to lighter, taller pots. The short walls put our arms at a more natural angle than with taller models, a confidence builder when we slowly drained hot water after boiling corn on the cob. This also made it very easy to stir and peek inside while cooking. The pot performed well and had no durability issues.
Model Number: n/aConstruction: Five-ply stainless steel and aluminumWeight Without Lid: 5 lb, 10⅜ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $289
  • Durability
  • Ease Of Use
  • Performance
Although it weighed in at more than 5 pounds, this pot was shorter and wider than most of the models we tested, so it was easier to maneuver compared to lighter, taller pots. The short walls put our arms at a more natural angle than with taller models, a confidence builder when we slowly drained hot water after boiling corn on the cob. This also made it very easy to stir and peek inside while cooking. The pot performed well and had no durability issues.
Model Number: n/aConstruction: Five-ply stainless steel and aluminumWeight Without Lid: 5 lb, 10⅜ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $289
  • Durability
  • Ease of Use
  • Performance

All-Clad D3 Stainless 12 Qt. Stockpot

This pricey stockpot performed well. Its squarish metal handles, which were the shortest in the lineup at 1⅝ inches long, were comfortable to hold, but they weren't quite as accommodating as our winner's. Overall, though, this pot did an excellent job.
Model Number: 4512Construction: Aluminum core sandwiched between two layers of stainless steelWeight Without Lid: 5 lb, 6½ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $387.95
  • Durability
  • Ease of Use
  • Performance
This pricey stockpot performed well. Its squarish metal handles, which were the shortest in the lineup at 1⅝ inches long, were comfortable to hold, but they weren't quite as accommodating as our winner's. Overall, though, this pot did an excellent job.
Model Number: 4512Construction: Aluminum core sandwiched between two layers of stainless steelWeight Without Lid: 5 lb, 6½ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $387.95

Recommended with reservations

  • Durability
  • Ease of Use
  • Performance

Cuisinart Multiclad Pro Triple Ply Stainless Cookware 12 Quart Stockpot with Cover

This pot performed well and was fairly easy to use, featuring large handles. But it was heavy; this was especially noticeable when we had to lug it to the sink to strain chicken stock.
Model Number: MCP66-28NConstruction: Aluminum core sandwiched between two layers of 18/10 stainless steelWeight Without Lid: 6 lb, 13⅛ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $115.94
  • Durability
  • Ease of Use
  • Performance
This pot performed well and was fairly easy to use, featuring large handles. But it was heavy; this was especially noticeable when we had to lug it to the sink to strain chicken stock.
Model Number: MCP66-28NConstruction: Aluminum core sandwiched between two layers of 18/10 stainless steelWeight Without Lid: 6 lb, 13⅛ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $115.94
  • Durability
  • Ease of Use
  • Performance

Rachael Ray Enamel on Steel 12 Qt. Covered Stockpot in Marine Blue

Easy to lift and maneuver, this model was the only one to weigh less than 4 pounds without its lid. Some people also liked this enamel-coated pot’s model's bright color, but the accolades ended there.The enamel coating wasn't durable enough to withstand heat when we sautéed in it, turning from a cream color to brown before we even added any food. We were able to scrub away the discoloration, but it took some work.
Model Number: 46326Construction: Steel core sandwiched between two layers of enamelWeight Without Lid: 3 lb, 7⅝ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $44.95
  • Durability
  • Ease of Use
  • Performance
Easy to lift and maneuver, this model was the only one to weigh less than 4 pounds without its lid. Some people also liked this enamel-coated pot’s model's bright color, but the accolades ended there.The enamel coating wasn't durable enough to withstand heat when we sautéed in it, turning from a cream color to brown before we even added any food. We were able to scrub away the discoloration, but it took some work.
Model Number: 46326Construction: Steel core sandwiched between two layers of enamelWeight Without Lid: 3 lb, 7⅝ ozInduction Compatible: YesPrice at Time of Testing: $44.95

*All products reviewed by America’s Test Kitchen are independently chosen, researched, and reviewed by our editors. We buy products for testing at retail locations and do not accept unsolicited samples for testing. We list suggested sources for recommended products as a convenience to our readers but do not endorse specific retailers. When you choose to purchase our editorial recommendations from the links we provide, we may earn an affiliate commission. Prices are subject to change.

America's Test Kitchen Accolades Badge

Reviews You Can Trust

The mission of America’s Test Kitchen Reviews is to find the best equipment and ingredients for the home cook through rigorous, hands-on testing. We stand behind our winners so much that we even put our seal of approval on them. Have a question or suggestion? Send us an email at atkreviews@americastestkitchen.com. We appreciate your feedback!

The Expert

Author: Crispín López

byCrispín López

Assistant Editor, ATK Reviews

Crispín is an Assistant Editor for ATK Reviews. He started his career in broadcast journalism before entering the world of food and hospitality.

Crispín is an Assistant Editor for ATK Reviews. A graduate of Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism, he started his career in broadcast journalism. After several years working both in front of and behind the camera, he entered the world of food and hospitality. He was a culinary intern at America’s Test Kitchen and managed a Boston-area restaurant before returning to ATK as a member of the Kitchen Operations team and now Reviews team. In his downtime, he loves cooking for his wife and two kids and misses the Mexican food from his hometown of El Paso, Texas.

Reviews You Can Trust.
See Why.

This is a members' feature.

America's Test Kitchen LogoCook's Country LogoCook's Illustrated Logo